Menu
Your Own Law Firm
  • START HERE
  • Niche Marketing Roadmap
  • Create a Blog in 4 Minutes!
  • Create a Website in 15 Minutes!
  • Aaron Morris
  • Starting Your Own Law Firm
  • Articles
Your Own Law Firm

Damning With Faint Praise – The Ongoing Saga of Bell v. Igal Feibush

Posted on March 25, 2013March 16, 2022 by Aaron Morris

Abomination Snowman

 

Can’t a guy get a few minutes to enjoy his victory?

As discussed in greater detail here, we forged an important precedent as regards the application of Penal Code § 496(c). Our client loaned the defendant $202,500 that was never repaid, and in addition to suing for breach of contract and fraud, I added a claim for theft under Penal Code § 496(c), which provides for the recovery of treble damages and attorney fees. We prevailed, and the trial court awarded just under $700,000.

Defendant appealed just on the application of the Penal Code, and on January 15, 2013, the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment and our interpretation of that section, holding that a civil claim for theft can be pursued even if there has been no criminal conviction, and that theft by false pretense qualifies as a theft under section 496(a). This was the first published opinion dealing with the award of treble damages under this Penal Code section, so we were justifiably quite excited.

But before the champagne corks had even returned to earth, I got a letter from counsel for Defendant, sent to me but addressed to my client, with the usual posturing about how the judgment would not hold up (sort of like the letter that was sent before the appeal to the Court of Appeal):

Your judgment is not settled. Although the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment, my client is being courted [well that’s gotta feel good] by firms willing to take the case up to the Supreme Court [please line up to the left]. Your attorney is very intelligent [please, I’m blushing] and very skilled [oh stop], but so are many other attorneys in California [oh yeah? name five] with a higher amount of appellate experience [I’ve been doing this for 26 years, so they must be really old], one of which is a well-known appeal lawyer [Vinny Gambini?] who has been brought in by others who have noticed the case and wish to dispute what is considered an abomination of law [well I, wait . . . what now?].

Then came a motion to depublish the opinion of the Court of Appeal. An attorney with no relation to the action or parties filed a letter brief requesting that my hard-earned opinion be depublished, stating that it was neither “fair or soundly reasoned.” Easy there buddy, that’s my reasoning you’re talking about, as well as Judge James Di Cesare (clearly an outstanding legal mind since he agreed with me) and Justices Fybel, Aronson and Presiding Justice O’Leary (ditto).

Well Mr. Not Soundly Reasoned, you concede that victims of theft “indisputably have standing” to bring a civil action under section 496(c), but you assert such action is available only after a defendant has first been criminally convicted for theft. So you agree that the award of treble damages is appropriate (at least under the Legislative intent) where a theft has occurred. If it is appropriate to award treble damages when there has been a theft, how does it become inappropriate if the theft is only proven civilly? Why should a victim’s damages turn on whether the police arrest and the District Attorney prosecutes? Where’s the sound reasoning in that?

I’ll let you know if the Supreme Court decides that our verdict was an abomination.

Could life at a big firm ever be this much fun?

[UPDATE:]  The Supreme Court apparently determined that our verdict was not an abomination, and on April 10, 2013 not only DENIED the request to depublish the opinion, but on its own motion ruled that it will not review the opinion of the Court of Appeal and, to put a fine point on it, stated that “the matter is now final.” I take that to mean the Supreme Court is saying, “Mr. Morris’ legal reasoning is the best we have encountered since California became a state, and there is no way we would ever presume to review it even if you ask us to,” but I could be reading too much into it. I guess all the appeal attorneys who were courting the defendant will now take their chocolates and flowers and go home.

1 thought on “Damning With Faint Praise – The Ongoing Saga of Bell v. Igal Feibush”

  1. Pingback: Bell v. Feibush - Six Years Later - Aaron Morris, AttorneyAaron Morris, Attorney

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact Aaron Morris

Aaron Morris
Morris & Stone, LLP
11 Orchard Road, Suite 106
Lake Forest, CA 92630
(714) 954-0700
Email Aaron Morris

Find this information useful or entertaining?

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Search YourOwnLawFirm.com

#1 Law Firm Marketing Book on Amazon:

Just $4.99, or get a copy
FREE on Kindle Unlimited!

Starting Your Own Law Firm Series

  • Starting Your Own Law Firm
  • Starting Your Own Law Firm – Should I Really Go “Solo”?
  • Starting Your Own law Firm – Choosing Your Office Space
  • Starting Your Own Law Firm – Equipping Your Office
  • Number 1 Rule for a Satisfying Law Practice
  • Adding Profit by Shedding Preconceived Notions
  • Six Rules for 100% Caller to Client Lead Conversion
  • How to Use Flat Fees for a Profitable Practice
  • How to Market Your Law Firm With a Podcast

Law Firm Marketing Series

  • Niche Marketing Roadmap
  • How to Pick a Niche Practice Area
  • Creating Your Niche Website
    • Create a Blog in 4 Minutes!
    • Create a Website in 15 Minutes!
  • How to Create Epic Content for Your Blog
  • Using Content Marketing to Show Off Your Expertise
  • How a Niche Site Can Add $100,000 to Bottom Line
  • Another Benefit of Content Based Marketing
  • How to Market Your Law Firm With a Podcast
  • 6 Rules for 100% Caller to Client Conversion

Gotta Love Those Travel Points

Recent Wisdom

  • buy me a coffee tip jarThe Entertaining Use of “Buy Me A Coffee”
  • Dealing with clients who are convinced, “They are up to something.”
  • Using the HP e-Print Feature at Your Law Office
  • EfficiencyOrganize Your Chrome Bookmarks to Save Time
  • proofreading documentsProofreading Documents by Having Them Read to You — Natural Reader Review
  • charge for consultationShould You Charge for Consultations?

NOTICE 1 — Affiliate Links

I provide affiliate links in this website that pay me a few shekels if you click through and buy the product. However, in all cases these were products that I use or have thoroughly researched, and would recommend regardless of the affiliate program. Also, I seek out or arrange the best deals for you, so buying the product or service through my affiliate link will often save you money; a clear win-win. If you do purchase through my affiliate link, thank you so much for your support!

NOTICE 2 — NOT LEGAL ADVICE

NOTICE PURSUANT TO BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 6158.3: This website is directed to lawyers and the practice of law, and is not directed to potential clients. To the extent the author tells a war story, the outcome of any case will depend on the facts specific to that case. Nothing contained in any portion of this web site should be taken as a representation of how your particular case would be concluded, or even that a case with similar facts will have a similar result. The result of any case discussed herein was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts.

This site seeks to present information in a hopefully entertaining manner. Hyperbolic language should not be taken literally. For example, if the author refers to himself as the “Sultan of SLAPP” or the “Pharaoh of Free Speech,” it should not be assumed that he is actually a Sultan or a Pharaoh.

Factual summaries are entirely accurate in the sense of establishing the legal scenario, but are changed as necessary to protect the privacy of the clients.

Blogroll

  • Aaron Morris
  • Best Defamation Attorney
  • California SLAPP Law
  • Internet Defamation
  • Morris & Stone
  • Practice of Law Blog
  • What is Defamation?
©2023 Your Own Law Firm | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes